Hong Kong SFC Fines IPO Sponsor TC Capital $382,000 & Suspends Chairman Edward Wu License for 7 Months for Due Diligence Failure in China Candy IPO in
Hong Kong, Asia's leading financial centre Caproasia.com | The leading source of data, research, information & resource for investment managers, professional investors, UHNW & HNW investors, and advisors to institutions, billionaires, UHNWs & HNWs. Covering capital markets, investments and private wealth in Asia. How do you invest $3 million to $300 million? How do you manage $20 million to $3 billion of assets? Caproasia - Learn more Contact Us / Sign Up: Click here Visit: Caproasia.com | Caproasia Access | 2022 Events | TFC - Find Services | Grow Business | Sign Up For Media, Events, Networking, Roundtable, Membership - Contact Us Grow Your Clients, Business & AUM. Start in 24 hours. List Services: HNW | Private Wealth | Family Office | Investment This site is for accredited investors, professional investors, investment managers and financial professionals only. You should have assets around $3 million to $300 million or managing $20 million to $3 billion. 
Hong Kong SFC Fines IPO Sponsor TC Capital $382,000 & Suspends Chairman Edward Wu License for 7 Months for Due Diligence Failure in China Candy IPO in 2015, Shares Suspended in 2017 & Cancelled in 2019 4th August 2022 | Hong Kong
The Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) has fined IPO sponsor TC Capital International $382,000 (HKD 3 million) and suspended Chairman Edward Wu Wen Guang for 7 months for due diligence failure in China Candy IPO in 2015 (China Candy shares was subsequently suspended in 2017 and cancelled in 2019 by Stock Exchange of Hong Kong). As IPO Sponsor of China Candy, TC Capital had failed to conduct reasonable due diligence on the 3rd payments made on behalf of 2 top customers of China Candy, and failed to maintain proper records of the due diligence work allegedly done. Hong Kong SFC: “The SFC’s investigation revealed that a significant portion of China Candy’s revenue during the track record period was contributed by two top customers who settled most of their payments to China Candy through multiple third parties, which should have been considered as a red flag as they might be used to disguise the original source of funds and facilitate a fraudulent scheme. Although Wu claimed that he was aware of the third party payments, which were shown in the due diligence documents, he and the transaction team members did not turn their mind to the question of whether further enquiries were necessary and/or assess with a questioning mind as to whether such payment method was legitimate. No further follow-up due diligence was conducted by TC Capital to ascertain the extent of the third party payments and the rationale for using this payment method … … The SFC’s investigation also revealed that there were no records showing how TC Capital enquired about the third party payments and/or came to the conclusion that the third party payments were immaterial to warrant disclosures in China Candy’s prospectus. There was also no audit trail demonstrating TC Capital had turned its mind to certain discrepancies identified in the due diligence documents and what conclusion it had reached, including inconsistent information as to the ownership of the two top customers who settled most of their payments to China Candy through third parties.” See below for HK SFC Statement | Statement of Disciplinary Action
“ HK SFC Fines IPO Sponsor TC Capital $382,000 & Suspends Chairman Edward Wu License for 7 Months for Due Diligence Failure in China Candy IPO in 2015 “
2021 Data Release 2020 List of Private Banks in Hong Kong2020 List of Private Banks in Singapore 2020 Top 10 Largest Family Office2020 Top 10 Largest Multi-Family Offices2020 Report: Hong Kong Private Banks & Asset Mgmt - $4.49 Trillion2020 Report: Singapore Asset Mgmt - $3.48 Trillion AUM New to Caproasia? Join 10,000 + Financial Professionals & Professional Investors Learn More | Sign Up Today Caproasia.com | Caproasia Access 2022 Events | TFC - Find Services Grow Business | Contact Us SFC Statement:
Hong Kong, Asia’s leading financial centre SFC reprimands and fines TC Capital International Limited $3 million and suspends its responsible officer for sponsor failures.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reprimanded and fined TC Capital International Limited (TC Capital) $3 million for failing to discharge its duties as the sponsor in the listing application of China Candy Holdings Limited (China Candy) (Notes 1 to 3). The disciplinary action followed the SFC’s investigation which found that TC Capital failed to:
- conduct reasonable due diligence on the third party payments made on behalf of two top customers of China Candy; and
- maintain proper records of the due diligence work allegedly done in relation to the listing application.
The SFC has also suspended the licence of Mr Edward Wu Wen Guang for seven months from 29 July 2022 to 28 February 2023 for failing to discharge his duties as a responsible officer and sponsor principal of TC Capital in charge of China Candy’s listing application and the supervision of the transaction team responsible for the listing application (Note 4).
Failure to conduct reasonable due diligence on third party payments
The SFC’s investigation revealed that a significant portion of China Candy’s revenue during the track record period was contributed by two top customers who settled most of their payments to China Candy through multiple third parties, which should have been considered as a red flag as they might be used to disguise the original source of funds and facilitate a fraudulent scheme (Note 5).
Although Wu claimed that he was aware of the third party payments, which were shown in the due diligence documents, he and the transaction team members did not turn their mind to the question of whether further enquiries were necessary and/or assess with a questioning mind as to whether such payment method was legitimate. No further follow-up due diligence was conducted by TC Capital to ascertain the extent of the third party payments and the rationale for using this payment method.
Failure to maintain proper records of due diligence work
The SFC’s investigation also revealed that there were no records showing how TC Capital enquired about the third party payments and/or came to the conclusion that the third party payments were immaterial to warrant disclosures in China Candy’s prospectus.
There was also no audit trail demonstrating TC Capital had turned its mind to certain discrepancies identified in the due diligence documents and what conclusion it had reached, including inconsistent information as to the ownership of the two top customers who settled most of their payments to China Candy through third parties.
The SFC is of the view that TC Capital’s conduct fell below the standards expected of it as a sponsor and breached the requirements under Chapter 17 of the Code of Conduct (Notes 6 & 7). The SFC also considers that TC Capital’s failures are attributable to Wu’s failure to discharge his duties as a sponsor principal, a responsible officer and a member of the senior management of TC Capital. In deciding the disciplinary sanction, the SFC took into account all relevant circumstances, including:
- the need to send a strong deterrent message to the industry and market that sponsor failures will not be tolerated;
- TC Capital’s financial position (Note 8);
- TC Capital and Wu have no previous disciplinary record with the SFC; and
- TC Capital and Wu cooperated with the SFC in resolving the SFC’s concerns.
Notes:
For CEOs, Heads, Senior Management, Market Heads, Desk Heads, Financial Professionals, Investment Managers, Asset Managers, Fund Managers, Hedge Funds, Boutique Funds, Analysts, Advisors, Wealth Managers, Private Bankers, Family Offices, Investment Bankers, Private Equity, Institutional Investors, Professional Investors Get Ahead in 60 Seconds. Join 10,000 + Sign Up / Contact Us Sign Up:
Free TrialBasic $120Professional $380Executive $2,000MembershipTeam / Corporate
Interests / Events / Summits / Roundtables / Networking:
Private WealthFamily OfficePrivate BankingWealth ManagementInvestmentsAlternativesPrivate MarketsCapital MarketsESG & SICEO & EntrepreneursTax, Legal & RisksHNW & UHNWs Insights
Your Name*
Company*
Job Title*
Email 1*
Email 2
Country
Your Message (leave blank if none)
Owl Media Group takes pride in providing social-first platforms which equally benefit and facilitate engagement between businesses and consumers and creating much-needed balance to make conducting business, easier, safer, faster and better. The vision behind every platform in the Owl Media suite is to make lives better and foster a healthy environment in which parties can conduct business efficiently. Facilitating free and fair business relationships is crucial for any thriving economy and Owl Media bridges the gap and open doors for transparent and successful transacting. No advertising funds influence the functionality of our media platforms because we value authenticity and never compromise on quality no matter how lucrative the offers from advertisers may seem.