Stay weblog, day two: The media’s protection of the 2020 presidential election

Post date:

Author:

Category:

As predicted, an exponential enhance in mail-in voting has compelled the election outcomes into their second day, and counting in battleground states is prone to proceed for presumably a number of extra days. Poynter is right here to doc notable media protection all through the day.

See one thing we should always learn about? Ship tricks to [email protected] For highlights from yesterday’s protection, click on right here.


Early this week, a number of native newspaper editors agreed to ship me Wednesday entrance pages as soon as they had been full. A number of included a word of warning: Due to early press occasions and a concentrate on digital audiences, these fronts won’t mirror the outcomes. This morning, they mirror the watch for outcomes and the temper of the nation completely. Right here’s a set of fronts from the U.S. and the remainder of the world.

— KRISTEN HARE, Editor of Regionally  (9:30 a.m. Jap)

From this morning’s Poynter Report with Tom Jones:

It’s not like we weren’t warned.

It’s not like we haven’t been advised for the previous a number of weeks that Election Day was going to be extra like Election Week.

And in order we get up on this Wednesday morning and we nonetheless aren’t positive who would be the subsequent president, we shouldn’t be in any respect stunned.

And but right here we’re: annoyed, anxious, harassed and nonetheless unsure about not solely who the president will likely be, however when he will likely be named.

“We’re going to be crawling,” NBC Information’ Chuck Todd stated early this morning.

We wait on votes to be added up in a number of states, whereas as soon as once more doubting the polls, dismissing the projections and questioning how that is all going to finish.

But, that is precisely what we anticipated. Or ought to have anticipated.

Simply after midnight, CNN’s Jake Tapper stated, “I do really feel like we’ve been saying for a very long time that something might occur and it’s actually going to return down to those three states — Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan — and that we’re most likely not going to know who received these states due to all of the early voting the evening of election evening and all of that’s occurring. And but it nonetheless seems like individuals on the market didn’t hear us after we had been telling them that in earlier weeks.”

Possibly it’s as a result of we, typically, are an impatient society. Or possibly we actually didn’t imagine the warnings that it was going to take longer than it often has. Sadly, we nonetheless may need a methods to go if this factor finally ends up going to court docket.

Throughout his look on MSNBC, former Obama marketing campaign supervisor David Plouffe stated, “That is going to be a extremely, actually ugly 24 to 72 hours, one thing we’ve by no means seen in American historical past.”

And about President Donald Trump questioning the validity of the election?

“It’s extra bark than chunk,” Plouffe stated, “nevertheless it’s nonetheless going to be actually exhausting to look at.”

Seems it was loads of chunk, too, as I’ll get into under.

Keep in mind how loopy the 2000 election was due to Florida? Fox Enterprise’ Neil Cavuto put the 2020 election this manner: “It might be six occasions that with six states.”

Go right here to learn the complete publication.


From this morning’s Protecting COVID-19 publication from Poynter senior college Al Tompkins:

Whereas the nation watches vote totals rolling in, don’t take your eyes off of different huge unfolding information.

You’ll be able to hear in dwell at present to the Supreme Courtroom listening to that would have far-reaching implications, not only for the rights of same-sex {couples}, however for non secular establishments that need to have the ability to discriminate towards others when non secular beliefs are concerned.

The case earlier than the court docket at present comes from Philadelphia, the place town stopped referring kids who want foster care to Catholic Social Companies after town discovered that CSS refused to put youngsters with same-sex {couples}. Up till town discovered about that observe, Catholic Social Companies was — for many years — one of many metropolis’s most dependable contract businesses.

USA At present supplies a abstract of what’s at stake:

The dispute pits the Structure’s assure of non secular freedom towards authorities bans on discrimination. When the court docket confronted the same case in 2018 involving a Colorado baker who refused to create a marriage cake for a same-sex couple, it issued a minor ruling that did not resolve the query.

This time, the addition of Affiliate Justice Amy Coney Barrett offers the court docket’s conservatives a 6-Three majority, placing in danger a 30-year-old Supreme Courtroom precedent that made it tough for non secular teams to keep away from impartial legal guidelines that apply to everybody. A number of justices are desperate to overturn the precedent — written, satirically, in 1990 by conservative Affiliate Justice Antonin Scalia.

It’s doable that this might have a lot broader implications if the court docket’s ruling strays past the slim confines of this case and addresses the problem of non secular freedom versus discrimination extra broadly.

NBC Information explains:

Carlos Ball, a professor at Rutgers Regulation Faculty and writer of “The First Modification and LGBT Equality: A Contentious Historical past,” stated the “potential influence is large.”

“If the Supreme Courtroom holds that non secular organizations have a constitutional proper to be exempted from anti-discrimination legal guidelines once they obtain authorities cash to conduct sure actions — equivalent to putting foster care kids with foster dad and mom — that may considerably restrict the influence and efficacy of civil rights legal guidelines,” Ball stated. “It would primarily permit anybody who has a spiritual foundation for discriminating to assert that they’re constitutionally exempt from the appliance of civil rights legal guidelines.”

SCOTUSBlog does its regular improbable job of guiding you thru the case.

Go right here to learn the complete publication.



OMG is consistently cementing what Social-First means, the way it positively transforms society over the long-term and most significantly, it have to be the industrial mannequin companies convert to. The ethics we dwell by, form our values and tradition. Now we have made nice strides due to the help we obtain from the general public.

STAY CONNECTED

20,831FansLike
2,451FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe